SKU: 96697064956

Probierpaket Filterkaffee Mild 4x 250g - 4 Kaffeesorten, gemischt

$41.65 $46.28
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on iskcon-muenchen.de >

Pay in installments of $11.57 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 3 - Aug 8

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Probierpaket Filterkaffee Mild 4x 250g - 4 Kaffeesorten, gemischtProbierpaket Filterkaffee Mild 4 250 g ganze Bohnen Mit dem Probierpaket Filterkaffee Mild entdeckst du vier sorgfltig ausgewhlte Filterkaffees mit besonders weichem, ausgewogenem Geschmacksprofil. Alle Kaffees bestehen aus 100 % Arabica Bohnen und eignen sich ideal fr Handfilter, Chemex, Aeropress oder die klassische Filtermaschine. Perfekt zum Kennenlernen, Vergleichen oder Verschenken. Herkunft & Rstprofil Die Kaffees stammen aus renommierten

Probierpaket Filterkaffee Mild – 4 × 250 g ganze Bohnen

Mit dem Probierpaket Filterkaffee Mild entdeckst du vier sorgfältig ausgewählte Filterkaffees mit besonders weichem, ausgewogenem Geschmacksprofil. Alle Kaffees bestehen aus 100 % Arabica-Bohnen und eignen sich ideal für Handfilter, Chemex, Aeropress oder die klassische Filtermaschine. Perfekt zum Kennenlernen, Vergleichen oder Verschenken.

Herkunft & Röstprofil

Die Kaffees stammen aus renommierten Anbaugebieten in Zentral- und Südamerika, darunter Guatemala, Brasilien, Nicaragua und Kolumbien. Unterschiedliche Anbauhöhen, Varietäten und Aufbereitungsarten sorgen für eine spannende Bandbreite milder Aromen – von schokoladig-nussig bis fein fruchtig. Schonend geröstet für eine bekömmliche Tasse ohne Bitterkeit.

Inhalt des Probierpakets (je 250 g ganze Bohnen)

House Blend – ausgewogen & schokoladig

Der House Blend Filterkaffee ist eine harmonische Komposition aus 100 % Arabica-Bohnen aus Brasilien, Guatemala und Kolumbien. Die Bohnen wachsen auf 1.000–1.600 m Höhe und werden gewaschen aufbereitet, was für Klarheit und Frische sorgt.

Verwendete Varietäten wie Castillo, Catimor, Colombia, Yellow Bourbon, Catuai und Mundo Novo vereinen sich zu einem vollmundigen, weichen Kaffee mit Noten von Vollmilchschokolade und einer angenehm milden Säure. Ideal als Alltagskaffee – pur oder mit Milch.

Guatemala – elegant & feinwürzig

Dieser Single Origin Guatemala Filterkaffee stammt von der Kooperative Lampocoy aus der vulkanisch geprägten Region Nuevo Oriente. Auf rund 1.350 m Höhe angebaut und gewaschen aufbereitet, überzeugt er mit klarer Struktur und balancierter Säure.

In der Tasse zeigen sich süße Noten von Karamell, Pekannuss und feinem Nougat, getragen von einem weichen Mundgefühl. Die Varietäten Caturra, Catimor und Bourbon sorgen für ein harmonisches, elegantes Geschmacksprofil.

Brasilien – mild & natürlich süß

Der Brasilien Filterkaffee ist ein Single Origin aus der Region Cerrado, Minas Gerais und wird von der Familie Andrade angebaut. Die Bohnen wachsen auf 800–1.050 m Höhe und werden natural aufbereitet – also in der Kaffeekirsche sonnengetrocknet.

Diese Aufbereitung verleiht dem Kaffee eine natürliche Süße. Mild im Körper und besonders weich im Geschmack, dominieren Noten von Milchschokolade und ein rundes, süßliches Aroma. Die Varietäten Yellow Icatu und Red Catuai runden das Profil perfekt ab.

Nicaragua – sanft & ausgewogen

Dieser Single Origin Nicaragua Filterkaffee stammt von der Kooperative Aldea Global aus den Bergregionen Nicaraguas. Angebaut auf 1.200–1.500 m Höhe und gewaschen aufbereitet, entsteht eine klare, fein strukturierte Tasse.

Geschmacklich überzeugt der Kaffee mit nussigen Aromen, einem Hauch roter Früchte und milder Milchschokolade. Der mittelkräftige Körper und Varietäten wie Caturra, Red Catuai und Pacamara sorgen für eine harmonische Balance aus Süße und dezenter Fruchtsäure.

Produktdetails auf einen Blick

  • Bohnen: ganze Bohnen
  • Kaffeesorte: 100 % Arabica
  • Röstgrad: mild bis mittel
  • Gesamtmenge: 1 kg (4 × 250 g)
  • Aufbereitung: gewaschen & natural
  • Geeignet für: Filterkaffee, Handfilter, Chemex, Aeropress

Tipp: Für bestes Aroma die Bohnen immer frisch mahlen und mit weichem, gefiltertem Wasser aufbrühen.

Das Probierpaket Filterkaffee Mild ist ideal für alle, die sanften, ausgewogenen Filterkaffee lieben oder ein hochwertiges Kaffee-Geschenk suchen.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 96697064956

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.2 ★★★★★
Based on 23 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
P
Verified Purchase
paige alexander
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Tasty
Yummy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 7, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
slimwriter
Charlottesville, US
★★★★★ 2
Not sour
Not really sour at all so it’s a pretty disappointing candy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Moon Riley
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Sugar free
Tastes great
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026
M
Verified Purchase
Mr. Paul A. Ackermann
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 5
Dude, it's not just a horror novel
Format: Paperback
This is to the previous reviewer (C. Scanlan). If this is just a horror novel, it failed miserably. It is not exactly a blood ’n gore thriller. Compared to Stephen King, it is pretty tame. What puts the horror in this book is that it is social commentary. Mary Shelly is not just trying to scare us. It is more than just a “Friday the 13th” movie. Mary Shelly is delivering a message. It seems that everyone understands this except this reviewer. There have been several different interpretations of the novel (see [...] for 10 different meanings of the novel). ICE takes the interpretation that Shelly is saying science can go too far. This is a perfectly valid interpretation. One can disagree with this interpretation but let’s not resort to name calling and personal attacks – that those who hold such an interpretation are doing a “low level attempt to cash in on home schooling Christian paranoia and fear of health care” or believe that “AIDS [is] the fruit of sin”. My wife and I are Catholic parents and we sent our children to public schools He mocks the idea of a secular fundamentalist but then demonstrates what that is. A religious fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as being of the devil. A secular fundamentalist sees anyone who disagrees with him as guilty of “brainwashing” others. In both cases, true dialogue is impossible. Another thing that a fundamentalist does is that he sees things in opposite extremes. If you are warning of the dangers of trusting too much in science then you must be against science. There is no middle ground for the fundamentalist. If you see that science can sometimes go too far then that means you are against health care. But this is a non-sequitur. Nielson writes “Frankenstein’s placing of the creation of life within the scientific method first destroys the unrepeatability and systematically eliminates the other elements [of hope, love, beauty, creativity and sacrifice]”. Nielson is not criticizing the scientific method in total. He is only criticizing it in the creation of life. The reviewer writes “He thereby easily and explicitly condemns the whole process and philosophy of the scientific method”. But Nielson is not condemning the whole process of the scientific method. He is only condemning it in the creation of life. The reviewer then mocks the credentials of the critics in the book - “So who are these essayists superior to Norton's and Oxfords and free of deconstructionist feminist secular fundamentalism, experts so august Ignatius should want them mentioned on their product page yet are nowhere to be seen?” But this game can be played both ways. What are the credentials of this reviewer? Is this reviewer so august as to challenge these essayists? Again, this is merely an ad-hominem attack. I really do not care who has the best credentials. What matters is who makes sense. Sometimes intellectuals can make the dumbest claims. Read Paul Johnson’s book, “Intellectuals” (http://www.amazon.com/Intellectuals-Marx-Tolstoy-Sartre-Chomsky/dp/0061253170/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1421862888&sr=8-1&keywords=intellectuals). He compares the essayists unfavorably to “good solid Roman Catholic moral theology” from the likes of Richard A. McCormick S.J., who “is the renowned leader of Roman Catholic Moral Theology in the field of bioethics in the USA.” He overlooks the fact that A. McCormick S.J. has dissented from teachings of the Popes Paul VI, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI over contraception. The “renowned leader” in the Catholic Church in morality is first and foremost the pope. Since Richard A. McCormick has contradicted the popes, he cannot be a good solid Catholic theologian. Mary Shelly lived right after the Enlightenment – man is the measure of all things. She lived at a time when people believed that science will solve all our problems. This is called scientism. ICE contends that Shelly is saying that we may be expecting too much from science. It does not mean that Shelly was saying that we should reject science. And it does not mean that Shelly believes that we should go back to the Catholic faith. In fact, ICE acknowledges that Shelly was an anti-Catholic. But the Church believes that the kernel of truth can be found in others, even in anti-Catholics. This is part of the Catholic tradition. St Augustine learned from Plato and St Aquinas learned from Aristotle. ICE would take that kernel of truth and expound that with the fullness of the Catholic faith. You may disagree with the Catholic faith, or with ICE looking at Shelly’s book from a Catholic perspective. But this is at least as a legitimate an interpretation as any other. In fact, this interpretation seems closer to the truth than the others. This interpretation is the traditional interpretation, which means that it goes back further to Shelly’s time than the modern interpretations, and is therefore less likely to be in error. BTW, the reviewer wrote that “Opus Dei right wing publishing (or reprint) house is selling this novel is to milk the home school market and to support its own bizarre bio-ethical ideology”. This is factually wrong. The company that publishes Opus Dei’s books is Sceptre. But the publisher of ICE is Ignatius Press.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2015
R
Verified Purchase
RC Mom
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
Good experience
Format: Paperback
It was all good.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 24, 2025

recommand products

Leinwandbild 3-teilig The Blue Drop
104.90
Leinwandbild 3-teilig Physical
104.90
Leinwandbild 3-teilig Eine Holzbrücke im fernen Osten
69.90
Leinwandbild 3-teilig Nazara North Canyon
104.90
Leinwandbild 3-teilig Das Segelschiff
69.90